Operation Kill Bill: How World-Changing UFO Language Was Killed And Sliced Up Into Little Pieces
Written by Christopher Sharp - 8 December 2023
There is no way to spin it.
This was a defeat - key Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) language contained within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2024 was brutally killed - removing any semblance of meaning.
People vs Defence Contractors and the Intelligence Community.
Oversight vs Corruption.
Democracy vs Special Interests.
The latter in each case won.
The Controlled Disclosure Campaign - killed.
The Independent Review Board dedicated to the disclosure of UAP information and materials - killed.
The authority of eminent domain wielded by the U.S. Federal Government over any materials or biological evidence of unknown or non-human origin - killed.
New whistleblower and witness protections - killed.
Enforcement of subpoena - killed.
Amnesty provision for defense contractors and other entities in possession of UAP-related material and involved in illegalities - killed.
Even Senator Chuck Schumer, the influential Senate Leader, along with many others within Congress, couldn't break through the barriers of secrecy shrouding UAP.
But this was a battle within a much larger war being fought.
One person recently told Liberation Times that the killing of the wide-ranging UAP language contained within the Senate’s NDAA was comparable to military jets flying over hostile territory to identify enemy radar systems.
Those hostile to transparency and democratic oversight are now known. To provide a few examples, according to multiple Liberation Times sources, they are:
Lockheed Martin
Representative Mike Turner - Chair of the House Intelligence Committee
Representative Mike Rogers - Chair of the House Armed Services Committee
Representative Mike Johnson - Speaker of the House
Senator Mitch McConnell - Minority Senate Leader
Senator Roger Wicker - Ranking Member of the Senate’s Armed Services Committee.
Sources indicate that the CIA and defense contractors pinpointed the key politicians named above, who were able to thwart other members of Congress, including Senators Schumer and Mike Rounds, who are understood to have fought hard to pass the language intact.
There is some slight positive news - Section 1687, referring to the Limitation On Use Of Funds For Certain Unreported Programs.
The language restricts the use of funds authorized for any activities related to UAP unless the Secretary of Defense provides details of such activities to specific congressional committees and leadership. Additionally, it imposes limitations on independent research and development funding for UAP unless information is made available to the same congressional entities.
However, that language no longer includes the level of detail contained within the initial language, including references to recovery and reverse engineering of UAP craft linked to the limitations of such funds.
If Lockheed Martin were lobbying politicians like Representative Turner, it's difficult to imagine they'd endorse the language if it had the potential to create any significant challenges.
For now, gone is the idea of a controlled disclosure relating to alleged programs relating to the retrieval and reverse engineering of non-human materials and biologics.
One silver lining has become clear though - they are hiding something.
Despite Representative Turner's apparent lack of interest and disregard for UAP allegations, he has vehemently strived to eliminate any substantive language within the NDAA. Two sources told Liberation Times that Representative Turner was “running around doing everything he could to kill the language.”
If there's truly nothing to hide, why are influential members of Congress, allegedly aided by the CIA and defense contractors, working so hard to conceal something that supposedly doesn't even exist? This raises serious questions and strongly hints at a substantial cover-up.
And now Senator Schumer has seen first-hand the level of resistance to this topic.
Why is that important?
Multiple sources have previously told Liberation Times that the original language he proposed was done in coordination with the White House.
And that may mean the White House is very aware of the resistance too.
If Schumer proposed the language with Senator Rounds as a proactive step to honour his late friend Senator Harry Reid, then that may not be a big deal.
But if Schumer was enacting the White House's agenda, then the repercussions of such resistance could have greater consequences.